Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):121-126 (2005)
It is sometimes suggested that new research in such areas as artificial intelligence, nanotechnology and genetic engineering should be halted or otherwise restricted because of concerns about possible catastrophic scenarios. Proponents of such restrictions typically invoke the precautionary principle, understood as a tool of policy formulation, as part of their case. Here I examine the application of the precautionary principle to possible catastrophic scenarios. I argue, along with Sunstein (Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002) and Manson (Environmental Ethics, 24: 263–274, 2002), that variants of the precautionary principle that appear strong enough to support significant restrictions on future technologies actually lead to contradictory policy recommendations. Weaker versions of the precautionary principle, which do not have this feature, do not appear strong enough to support restrictions on future technologies.
|Keywords||catastrophe cost–benefit analysis grey goo problem nanotechnology precautionary principle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
The Epistemology of the Precautionary Principle: Two Puzzles Resolved.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (5):1013-1021.
On the Epistemology of the Precautionary Principle.J. Adam Carter & Martin Peterson - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (1):1-13.
Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective.Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Ethics, Technology Development and Uncertainty: An Outline for Any Future Ethics of Technology.Paul Sollie - 2007 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 5 (4):293-306.
Similar books and articles
The Precautionary Principle in Nanotechnology.James Moor - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):191-204.
Avoiding the Trust Deficit: Public Engagement, Values, the Precautionary Principle and the Future of Nanotechnology. [REVIEW]Margaret Stebbing - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):37-48.
A Core Precautionary Principle.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1):33–60.
What's the Harm? An Evolutionary Theoretical Critique of the Precautionary Principle.Russell Powell - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):181-206.
Deciding About Your Health Care: The Ethicist as Policy-Maker. [REVIEW]Ronald Bailey - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):265-281.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
The Precautionary Principle: A Dialectical Reconsideration.H. Tristram Engelhardt & Fabrice Jotterand - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):301 – 312.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #90,832 of 2,158,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #65,070 of 2,158,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?