Generalized Quantifiers and Number Sense

Philosophy Compass 6 (9):611-621 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Generalized quantifiers are functions from pairs of properties to truth-values; these functions can be used to interpret natural language quantifiers. The space of such functions is vast and a great deal of research has sought to find natural constraints on the functions that interpret determiners and create quantifiers. These constraints have demonstrated that quantifiers rest on number and number sense. In the first part of the paper, we turn to developing this argument. In the remainder, we report on work in neurobiology that test the empirical claims of the theory. In particular, we look at fMRI experiments and behavioral experiments with various patient populations that support the intimate connection between natural language quantification and number sense

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers.Martin van den Berg - 1996 - In J. van der Does & Van J. Eijck (eds.), Quantifiers, Logic, and Language. Stanford University. pp. 63--94.
The Hierarchy Theorem for Second Order Generalized Quantifiers.Juha Kontinen - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):188 - 202.
Generalized Quantifiers, and Beyond.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse (208):309-326.
Definability of polyadic lifts of generalized quantifiers.Lauri Hella, Jouko Väänänen & Dag Westerståhl - 1997 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (3):305-335.
Quantification.Anna Szabolcsi - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-09

Downloads
53 (#265,163)

6 months
2 (#650,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Some Properties of Iterated Languages.Shane Steinert-Threlkeld - 2016 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25 (2):191-213.

Add more citations