Have biologists wrapped up philosophy?

Abstract
An examination of the currently fashionable thesis that scientists, and especially biologists in the wake of the Darwinian Revolution, can now solve the problems that traditional philosophers have only talked about. Past philosophers, for example during the Enlightenment, have themselves made use of contemporary, scientific techniques and theories. The present claim may only be another such move, to be welcomed by philosophers who would distinguish themselves from rhetoricians. Others may prefer to stake out the merely human or subjective world as their field, identifying 'truth' with 'what it's better to believe'. Both moderns and postmoderns must abandon the rational realism that actually sustained Enlightenment endeavours, and Darwinian explanation, on its own, must erode traditional ethical values and the meta-ethical assumptions that sustain them. Universal humanism is only one possible project among many - and Darwinian reasonings suggest that it is hypocritical. In this crisis there may after all be a rôle for traditional, Platonizing philosophers, believing that there is a truth, and that we can find it out. Such a theory is actually better able to explain our scientific successes, and our evolutionary past.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/002017400407726
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Gene's Eye View of Darwinian Populations.David Queller - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):905-913.
Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):55 - 69.
Informational Darwinism.Arthur B. Cody - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):167 – 179.
Pluralism and Panselectionism.John Beatty - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:113 - 128.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

23 ( #221,327 of 2,178,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #112,553 of 2,178,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums