History and Theory 45 (4):93-103 (2006)

Abstract
Contrary to Constantin Fasolt, I argue that it is no longer useful to think of religion as an anomaly in the modern age. Here is Fasolt’s main argument: humankind suffers from a radical rift between the self and the world. The chief function of religion is to mitigate or cope with this fracture by means of dogmas and rituals that reconcile the self to the world. In the past, religion successfully fulfilled this job. But in modernity, it fails to, and it fails because religion is no longer plausible. Historical, confessional religions, then, are no longer doing what they are supposed to do; yet the need for religion is still very much with us. Fasolt’s account would be a tragic tale, if not for his claim that there is a new religion for the modern age, a religion that fulfills the true reconciling function of religion. That new religion is the reading and writing of history. Indeed, for Fasolt, reading history is religiously redemptive, and writing history is a sacred act. The historian, it turns out, is the priest in modernity. In my response, I challenge both Fasolt’s remedy and its justification. Indeed, I reject both his romantic view of past religion as the peaceful reconciler, as well as his pessimistic view of present religion as the maker of “enemies” among modern people. In the end, I argue that the way Fasolt employs his categories—“alienation,” “salvation,” “religion,” “history”—is too vague to do much useful work. They are significant categories and they deserve our attention. But in my view, the story Fasolt tells is both too grim and too cheerful.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00385.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

History's Forgotten Doubles.Ashis Nandy - 1995 - History and Theory 34 (2):44-66.
History and Religion in the Modern Age.Constantin Fasolt - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (4):10-26.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

History and Religion in the Modern Age.Constantin Fasolt - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (4):10-26.
The Limits of History.Constantin Fasolt - 2004 - University of Chicago Press.
The Limits of History.Constantin Fasolt - 2013 - University of Chicago Press.
Race, Religion, and Ethics in the Modern/Colonial World.Nelson Maldonado-Torres - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (4):691-711.
The State of History and the Empire of Metaphysics.Ian Hunter - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (2):289–303.
William Durant the Younger and Conciliar Theory.Constantin Fasolt - 1997 - Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (3):385-402.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
8 ( #1,010,919 of 2,520,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes