Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (65):215- (2009)
For the last few years, thanks to the Leverhulme Trust, I've been largely absent from my department, working on the late antique philosopher Plotinus. To speak personally – it's been a difficult few years, since my youngest daughter has been afflicted with anorexia during this period, and my own bowel cancer was discovered, serendipitously, and removed, at the end of 2005. Since then I've had ample occasion to consider the importance – and the difficulty – of the practice of detachment, and also to worry about the moral some have drawn from Plotinian and similar philosophies, namely that the things of this world really do not matter much, and that we should withdraw ourselves from them. Maybe it is true, as Plotinus says, that ‘some troubles are profitable to the sufferers themselves, poverty and sickness for example’. But this is not an altogether helpful message for those afflicted by the bundle of disorders that lead to anorexia. It's difficult not to suspect, for example, that Simone Weil would have lived longer but for her Neo-Platonism. It has also been made obvious to me that we are much less in control of our own mental and emotional states even than I had thought before. None of this, of course, should have been any surprise: I have frequently pointed out – to myself and others – the importance of distinguishing between one's self and the states one finds oneself in, and the extreme difficulty of controlling the thoughts we say are ours . Any delusion that my knowledge of these facts is of itself enough to render me immune to them has been – at least for the moment – thoroughly debunked – though the facts themselves are such that this disillusionment, so to call it, is probably both temporary and almost entirely insincere!
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Platonism and the Origins of Modernity: The Platonic Tradition and the Rise of Modern Philosophy.Douglas Hedley & Sarah Hutton (eds.) - 2008 - Springer.
The Apprehension of Divinity in the Self and Cosmos in Plotinus.A. Hilary Armstrong - 1976 - In R. Baine Harris (ed.), The Significance of Neoplatonism. State University of New York Press. pp. 187--198.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Plotinus on Number (S.) Slaveva-Griffin Plotinus on Number. Pp. Xii + 176. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Cased £39.99, US$74, ISBN: 978-0-19-537719-. [REVIEW]Stephen R. L. Clark - 2010 - The Classical Review 60 (01):91-.
Pity in the Life and Thought of Plotinus.R. Ferwerda - 1984 - In David T. Runia (ed.), Plotinus Amid Gnostics and Christians: Papers Presented at the Plotinus Symposium Held at the Free University, Amsterdam, on 25 January 1984. Vu Uitgeverij/Free University Press.
Gnostic Influences in the Early Works of Plotinus and in Augustine.Th G. Sinnige - 1984 - In David T. Runia (ed.), Plotinus Amid Gnostics and Christians: Papers Presented at the Plotinus Symposium Held at the Free University, Amsterdam, on 25 January 1984. Vu Uitgeverij/Free University Press.
Plotinus Plotinus. Second and Third Enneads. Translated by Stephen Mackenna. Lee Warner, 1921. 22s. Net.W. R. Inge - 1922 - The Classical Review 36 (1-2):26-27.
Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW]Riccardo Chiaradonna - 2012 - Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Plotinus on Dialectic.Annamaria Schiaparelli - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Plotinus and The Presocratics (G.) Stamatellos Plotinus and the Presocractics. A Philosophical Study of Presocratic Influences in Plotinus' Enneads. Pp. Xii + 270. New York: State University of New York Press, 2007. Cased, US$75. ISBN: 978-0-7914-7061-. [REVIEW]Barrie Fleet - 2008 - The Classical Review 58 (02):441-.
Plotinus Plotinus: The Enneads. Translated by Stephen MacKenna. Revised by B. S. Page. Foreword by E. R. Dodds. Introduction by Paul Henry. Pp. Li+635. London: Faber, 1957. Cloth, 63s. Net. [REVIEW]A. H. Armstrong - 1958 - The Classical Review 8 (2):128-129.
Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories?Frans A. J. de Haas - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"?Frans A. J. De Haas - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the Similes of the Waxen Block and the Aviary.Robbert van den Berg - 2010 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):163-180.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads8 ( #486,930 of 2,158,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #359,001 of 2,158,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?