American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19 (2004)

Abstract
Currently, the common theoretical models of "preferred" decision-making relationships do not correspond well with clinical experience. This interview study of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients documents the variety of patient preferences for decision-making, and the necessity for attention to family involvement. In addition, these findings illustrate the confusion as to the designation of surrogate decision-makers and physicians in charge. We conclude that no single model of physician-patient decision-making should be preferred, and that physicians should first ask patients how they want medical information and decision-making to be handled.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/152651604323097934
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Health Care Decision Making.S. Joseph Tham & Marie Catherine Letendre - 2014 - The New Bioethics 20 (2):174-185.
Medical Experimentation, Ethics and Regulation: Some Strands of Enquiry.Ankita Chakravarty - 2016 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 26 (3):125-127.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
34 ( #335,078 of 2,506,367 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,367 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes