Scientific psychology and tenure

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):571-572 (2006)
Ceci et al. draw conclusions that are inaccurate, analyze and report results inappropriately, fail to translate their scale into policy-relevant terms, and draw overly strong conclusions from their single study. They also attribute all the ills of academic appointments to tenure, and ignore problems with other aspects of the system. Their conclusion that tenure is not supported is at best premature. (Published Online February 8 2007).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X06009162
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Put Tenure in Today's Social Context.John Wettersten - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):585-586.
Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
The Untouchables: Benefits, Costs, and Risks of Tenure in Real Cases.Frank Farley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
7 ( #539,310 of 2,202,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature