Two models of ethics committees

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):41-47 (2005)
A distinction is made between two models of ethics committees. According to the Mirror Model, ethics committees ought to reflect the values of society. The Critical Model says committees are to critically examine these standards rather than merely reflect them. It is argued that the Critical Model should be accepted because a society's ethical standards can be mistaken and a society that has Critical rather than merely Mirror ethics committees is more likely to have such mistakes revealed. Some implications of the Critical Model are discussed.
Keywords Ethics committees  philosophy  bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/BF02448814
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,507
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Experts.Peter Singer - 1972 - Analysis 32 (4):115 - 117.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Job of ‘Ethics Committees’.Andrew Moore & Andrew Donnelly - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):481-487.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
13 ( #419,462 of 2,268,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #145,383 of 2,268,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature