The two-envelope paradox

Mind 109 (435):415--442 (2000)
Authors
Nicholas Shackel
Cardiff University
Abstract
Previous claims to have resolved the two-envelope paradox have been premature. The paradoxical argument has been exposed as manifestly fallacious if there is an upper limit to the amount of money that may be put in an envelope; but the paradoxical cases which can be described if this limitation is removed do not involve mathematical error, nor can they be explained away in terms of the strangeness of infinity. Only by taking account of the partial sums of the infinite series of expected gains can the paradox be resolved.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/109.435.415
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Envelopes and Binding.Casper Storm Hansen - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):508-518.
Two Envelope Problems and the Roles of Ignorance.Gary Malinas - 2003 - Acta Analytica 18 (1-2):217-225.
Opening Two Envelopes.Paul Syverson - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):479-498.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
438 ( #7,067 of 2,263,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #11,839 of 2,263,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature