Do Theodicists Mean What They Say?

Philosophy 49 (190):357 - 374 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many theodicists have maintained that God is justified in permitting suffering on the ground that His doing so is a necessary condition of the realization of certain intrinsically valuable ends which the suffering serves and whose value outweighs the suffering which occasions them. Examples of ends which are frequently cited in this connection are freely chosen actions in accordance with stringent obligations to be charitable and steadfast. To say that the value of these ends outweighs the suffering which gives rise to them is to say that the existence both of these ends and of suffering is better than the non-existence of both

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On a recent discussion of if's and can's.Clement Dore - 1970 - Philosophical Studies 21 (1-2):33 - 37.
Commentary on “The Possibility of God”.James Patrick Downey - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):202-206.
On being able to do otherwise.Clement Dore - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):137-145.
More on the Meaning of 'Could Have'.Clement Dore - 1963 - Analysis 24 (2):41 - 43.
On the Meaning of 'Could Have'.Clement Dore - 1962 - Analysis 23 (2):41 - 43.
Agnosticism.Clement Dore - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (4):503 - 507.
A Problem for Theodicists.Theodore Benditt - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):470 - 474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
21 (#761,167)

6 months
12 (#243,409)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

God and evil.H. J. McCloskey - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (39):97-114.
Introduction.Nelson Pike - 1964 - In God and evil. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.

Add more references