Philosophy 49 (190):357 - 374 (1974)
Many theodicists have maintained that God is justified in permitting suffering on the ground that His doing so is a necessary condition of the realization of certain intrinsically valuable ends which the suffering serves and whose value outweighs the suffering which occasions them. Examples of ends which are frequently cited in this connection are freely chosen actions in accordance with stringent obligations to be charitable and steadfast. To say that the value of these ends outweighs the suffering which gives rise to them is to say that the existence both of these ends and of suffering is better than the non-existence of both
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On a Recent Discussion of If's and Can's.Clement Dore - 1970 - Philosophical Studies 21 (1-2):33 - 37.
The Christian Theodicist's Appeal to Love.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Frances Howard-Snyder - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):185 - 192.
Commentary on “The Possibility of God”.James Patrick Downey - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):202-206.
On the Alleged Connection Between Moral Evil and Human Freedom: Response to Nagasawa and Trakakis.Joel Thomas Tierno - 2004 - Sophia 43 (1):115-126.
Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?Nick Trakakis - 2008 - Sophia 47 (2):161-191.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads1 ( #875,886 of 2,164,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?