Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science

Philosophy of Science 69 (3):447-451 (2002)
Authors
Carol Cleland
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
Experimental research is commonly held up as the paradigm of "good" science. Although experiment plays many roles in science, its classical role is testing hypotheses in controlled laboratory settings. Historical science is sometimes held to be inferior on the grounds that its hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled laboratory experiments. Using contemporary examples from diverse scientific disciplines, this paper explores differences in practice between historical and experimental research vis-à-vis the testing of hypotheses. It rejects the claim that historical research is epistemically inferior. For as I argue, scientists engage in two very different patterns of evidential reasoning and, although there is overlap, one pattern predominates in historical research and the other pattern predominates in classical experimental research. I show that these different patterns of reasoning are grounded in an objective and remarkably pervasive time asymmetry of nature
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/342455
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,193
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Value of Epistemic Disagreement in Scientific Practice. The Case of Homo Floresiensis.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):169-177.
Dimensions of Integration in Interdisciplinary Explanations of the Origin of Evolutionary Novelty.Alan C. Love & Gary L. Lugar - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):537-550.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
360 ( #11,674 of 2,309,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #26,494 of 2,309,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature