Philosophy of Logic: Papers and Discussions
John P. Cleave & Stephan Körner (eds.)
Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press (1976)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Call number
BC51.B67 1974
ISBN(s)
0520032357 9780520032354
My notes
Chapters
and antagonize the reader'. In view of this and his own introductory remarks, it is not clear why the Lukasiewicz systems should be rescued after remaining for fifty years a mere cerebral bauble.J. P. Cleave
Professor Lejewski is opposed to the idea that the ontological commitments of an individual, or of a theory, are to be gauged by the existential assertions made by the former, or by the existential statements provable in the latter. Here, of course.Michael Dummett
Like Wiggins I am concerned with the proposition 4 (x)(y)((*= jyO=> B (y= x)) and its derivation from.Ian Hacking
Similar books and articles
The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism.Tang Yijie & Yan Xin - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
27 (#433,232)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-01-28
Downloads
27 (#433,232)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Abstraction in Fitch's Basic Logic.Eric Thomas Updike - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):215-243.