Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):542-547 (2005)
Objective: To examine current research payment practices and to inform development of clearer guidelines for researchers and ethics committees.Design: Exploratory email based questionnaire study of current research participant reimbursement practices. A diverse sample of organisations and individuals were targeted.Setting: Australia.Participants: Contacts in 84 key research organisations and select electronic listservers across Australia. A total of 100 completed questionnaires were received with representations from a variety of research areas .Main measurements: Open-ended and fixed alternative questions about type of research agency; type of research; type of population under study; whether payment is standard; amounts and mechanisms of payment; factors taken into account when deciding on payment practices; and whether payment policies exist.Results: Reimbursement practice is highly variable. Where it occurs it is largely monetary and is for time and out-of-pocket expenses. Ethics committees were reported to be often involved in decision making around reimbursement.Conclusions: Research subject payment practices vary in Australia. Researchers who do provide payments to research participants generally do so without written policy and procedures. Ethics committees have an important role in developing guidelines in this area. Specific guidelines are needed considering existing local policies and procedures; payment models and their application in diverse settings; case study examples of types and levels of reimbursement; applied definitions of incentive and inducement; and the rationale for diverse payment practices in different settings
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Living Wage for Research Subjects.Trisha B. Phillips - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):243-253.
Reflexivity and Dialogue: Methodological and Socio-Ethical Dilemmas in Research with HIV-Affected Children in East Africa.Morten Skovdal & Tatek Abebe - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (1):77 - 96.
Payment of Research Participants: Current Practice and Policies of Irish Research Ethics Committees.E. Roche, R. King, H. M. Mohan, B. Gavin & F. McNicholas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
A Living Wage for Research Subjects.Trisha B. Phillips - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):243-253.
Similar books and articles
What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research?David Wendler & Christine Grady - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
Ethical Practices and Beliefs of Psychopathology Researchers.Sandra T. Sigmon - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):295 – 309.
“The Neuroscience of Responsibility”—Workshop Report.Nicole A. Vincent, Pim Haselager & Gert-Jan Lokhorst - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (2):175-178.
Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Debriefing.Janet L. Brody, John P. Gluck & Alfredo S. Aragon - 2000 - Ethics and Behavior 10 (1):13 – 25.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Paying Research Subjects: Participants' Perspectives.M. L. Russell - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):126-130.
Human Participants Challenges in Youth-Focused Research: Perspectives and Practices of IRB Administrators.Diane K. Wagener, Amy K. Sporer, Mary Simmerling, Jennifer L. Flome, Christina An & Susan J. Curry - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):335 – 349.
Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW]Laura Welfare & Corrine Sackett - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Offering to Return Results to Research Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Principal Investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer - unknown
"It's for a Good Cause, Isn't It?" - Exploring Views of South African TB Research Participants on Sample Storage and Re-Use.Gerrit van Schalkwyk, Jantina de Vries & Keymanthri Moodley - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):19-.
Codes of Ethics Among Corporate Research Departments, Marketing Research Firms, and Data Subcontractors: An Examination of a Three-Communities Metaphor. [REVIEW]O. C. Ferrell, Michael D. Hartline & Stephen W. McDaniel - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):49-62.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads2 ( #745,968 of 2,146,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,701 of 2,146,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.