Foundations of Physics 21 (2):149-184 (1991)

Michael Redhead
London School of Economics
We further develop a recent new proof (by Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger—GHZ) that local deterministic hidden-variable theories are inconsistent with certain strict correlations predicted by quantum mechanics. First, we generalize GHZ's proof so that it applies to factorable stochastic theories, theories in which apparatus hidden variables are causally relevant to measurement results, and theories in which the hidden variables evolve indeterministically prior to the particle-apparatus interactions. Then we adopt a more general measure-theoretic approach which requires that GHZ's argument be modified in order to produce a valid proof. Finally, we motivate our more general proof's assumptions in a somewhat different way from previous authors in order to strengthen the implications of our proof as much as possible. After developing GHZ's proof along these lines, we then consider the analogue, for our proof, of Bohr's reply to the EPR argument, and conclude (pace GHZ) that in at least one respect (viz. that of most concern to Bohr) the proof is no more powerful than Bell's. Nevertheless, we point out some new advantages of our proof over Bell's, and over other algebraic proofs of nonlocality. And we conclude by giving a modified version of our proof that, like Bell's, does not rely on experimentally unrealizable strict correlations, but still leads to a testable “quasi-algebraic” locality inequality.“... to admit things not visible to the gross creatures that we are is, in my opinion, to show a decent humility, and not just a lamentable addiction to metaphysics.”J. S. Bell
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01889530
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Significance of the Gottesman–Knill Theorem.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1):91-121.
Reconsidering No-Go Theorems From a Practical Perspective.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3):633-655.
Nonlocality and Gleason's Lemma. Part 2. Stochastic Theories.Andrew Elby - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (11):1389-1397.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Branching Space-Time Analysis of the GHZ Theorem.Nuel Belnap & László E. Szabó - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (8):989-1002.
Multiparticle Entanglement.Daniel I. Fivel - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (4):561-570.
Algebraic Constraints on Hidden Variables.Arthur Fine & Paul Teller - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):629-636.
Hidden Variables and Locality.Jeffrey Bub - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (5):511-525.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Quantum Analogues of Hardy’s Nonlocality Paradox.Tobias Fritz - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (9):1493-1501.
Quantum Locality?Henry P. Stapp - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (5):647-655.


Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #123,826 of 2,324,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #303,931 of 2,324,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes