Philosophical Studies 140 (3):401 - 421 (2008)

Authors
Andrew Cling
University of Alabama, Huntsville
Abstract
The best extant statement of the epistemic regress problem makes assumptions that are too strong. An improved version assumes only that that reasons require support, that no proposition is supported only by endless regresses of reasons, and that some proposition is supported. These assumptions are individually plausible but jointly inconsistent. Attempts to explain support by means of unconceptualized sensations, contextually immunized propositions, endless regresses, and holistic coherence all require either additional reasons or an external condition on support that is arbitrary from the believer's own point of view.
Keywords Regress  Skepticism  Reasons  Foundationalism  Coherence  Contextualism  Infinitism  Paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9152-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Theory of Knowledge.Roderick Milton Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Coherentism Via Graphs.Selim Berker - 2015 - Philosophical Issues 25 (1):322-352.
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):95-109.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning.Peter Klein - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):1 - 17.
The Trouble with Infinitism.Andrew D. Cling - 2004 - Synthese 138 (1):101 - 123.
Internalist Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress.José L. Zalabardo - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34 - 58.
Epistemic and Dialectical Regress.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):43 – 60.
Propositions United.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (2):289-301.
Can There Be Epistemic Reasons for Action?Anthony Robert Booth - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):133-144.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
229 ( #44,438 of 2,455,413 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,407 of 2,455,413 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes