Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6):373-379 (2019)

Authors
Abstract
ObjectiveTo increase knowledge of how doctors perceive futile treatments and scarcity of resources at the end of life. In particular, their perceptions about whether and how resource limitations influence end-of-life decision making. This study builds on previous work that found some doctors include resource limitations in their understanding of the concept of futility.SettingThree tertiary hospitals in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia.DesignQualitative study using in-depth, semistructured, face-to-face interviews. Ninety-six doctors were interviewed in 11 medical specialties. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsDoctors’ perceptions of whether resource limitations were relevant to their practice varied, and doctors were more comfortable with explicit rather than implicit rationing. Several doctors incorporated resource limitations into their definition of futility. For some, availability of resources was one factor of many in assessing futility, secondary to patient considerations, but a few doctors indicated that the concept of futility concealed rationing. Doctors experienced moral distress due to the resource implications of providing futile treatment and the lack of administrative supports for bedside rationing.ConclusionsDoctors’ ability to distinguish between futility and rationing would be enhanced through regulatory support for explicit rationing and strategies to support doctors’ role in rationing at the bedside. Medical policies should address the distinction between resource limitations and futility to promote legitimacy in end-of-life decision making.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2018-105199
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,483
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Clinical Ethics and the Duty of Care.John McMillan - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6):355-356.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Withholding Life Prolonging Treatment, and Self Deception.G. M. Sayers - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):347-352.
The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment.Glenn G. Griener - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment.Glenn Greiner - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-16

Total views
14 ( #623,859 of 2,286,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #323,129 of 2,286,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature