Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):361-398 (2009)
Fair grading is modeled on two fundamental principles. The first principle is that grading should be impartial and consistent. The second principle is that a fair grade should be based on the student’s competence in the academic content of the course. I derive corollary principles of fair grading from these two basic principles and use them to evaluate common grading practices. I argue that exempting students from completing certain grade components is unfair, as is grading on attendance, class rank, deportment,tardiness, effort, institutional values, moral virtues such as cheerfulness and helpfulness, and other non-course-content criteria
|Keywords||teaching philosophy grading|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Triage Theory of Grading: The Good, the Bad, and the Middling.William J. Rapaport - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):347–372.
Fair Equality of Opportunity in Global Justice.Mark Navin - 2008 - Social Philosophy Today 24:39-52.
Toward a Fair Community of Scholars: Moral Education as the Negotiation of Classroom Practices.Theresa A. Thorkildsen - 1994 - Journal of Moral Education 23 (4):371-385.
"Fair's Fair Argument" and Voluntarism in Clinical Research: But, is It Fair?M. A. Perna - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):478-482.
The University and the Moral Imperative of Fair Trade Coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
Added to index2010-01-23
Total downloads60 ( #87,318 of 2,169,706 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,236 of 2,169,706 )
How can I increase my downloads?