Hobbes Studies 30 (1):4-27 (2017)

Abstract
_ Source: _Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 4 - 27 The _Animadversiones in Elementorum Philosophiae_ by a little known Flemish scholar G. Moranus, published in Brussels in 1655 was an early European response to Hobbes’s _De Corpore_. Although it is has been referred to by various Hobbes scholars, such as Noel Malcolm, Doug Jesseph, and Alexander Bird it has been little studied. Previous scholarship has tended to focus on the mathematical criticisms of André Tacquet which Moranus included in the form of a letter in his volume. Moranus’s philosophical objections to Hobbes’s natural philosophy offer a fascinating picture of the critical reception of Hobbes’s work by a religious writer trained in the late Scholastic tradition. Moranus’s opening criticism clearly shows that he is unhappy with Hobbes’s exclusion of the divine and the immaterial from natural philosophy. He asks what authority Hobbes has for breaking with the common understanding of philosophy, as defined by Cicero ‘the knowledge of things human and divine’. He also offers natural philosophical and theological criticisms of Hobbes for overlooking the generation of things involved in the Creation. He also attacks the natural philosophical underpinning of Hobbes’s civil philosophy. In this paper I look at a number of philosophical topics which Moranus criticised in Hobbes’s work, including his mechanical psychology, his theory of imaginary space, his use of the concept of accidents, his blurring of the distinction between the human being and the animal, and his theories of motion. Moranus’s criticisms, which are a mixture of philosophical and theological objections, gives us some clear indications of what made Hobbes’ natural philosophy controversial amongst his contemporaries, and sheds new light on the early continental reception of Hobbes’s work.
Keywords Moranus   Thomas Hobbes   accidents   mechanical psychology   minima naturalia   spatium imaginarium  Seth Ward
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18750257-03001002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Squaring the Circle: Hobbes on Philosophy and Geometry.Alexander Bird - 1996 - Journal of the History of Ideas 57 (2):217–31.
Les mathématiques et la méthode mathématique chez Hobbes.Wolfgang Breidert - 1979 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 33 (129):415-431.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hobbes 'Forgotten Natural Histories'.Robin Bunce - 2006 - Hobbes Studies 19 (1):77-104.
Hobbes, Universal Names, and Nominalism.Stewart Duncan - 2017 - In Stefano Di Bella & Tad M. Schmaltz (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
Aspects of Hobbes.Noel Malcolm - 2003 - Oxford University Press UK.
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-18

Total views
23 ( #433,461 of 2,348,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,546 of 2,348,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes