Events and the regress of pure powers: Reply to Taylor

Analysis 82 (4):647-654 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taylor has recently argued that adopting either the standard Kimian or Davidsonian approaches to the metaphysics of events quite directly solves the regress of pure powers. I argue, though, that on closer inspection Taylor’s proposal does not succeed, given either the Kimian or the Davidsonian account of events.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The regress of pure powers?Alexander Bird - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):513–534.
Powerful Problems for Powerful Qualities.Henry Taylor - 2019 - Erkenntnis 87 (1):425-433.
What Do Powers Do When They Are Not Manifested?Stathis Psillos - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):137-156.
The Regress of Pure Powers Revisited.Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):529-541.
Pure Powers Are Not Powerful Qualities.Joaquim Giannotti - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (1):(A2)5-29.
Powerful Qualities or Pure Powers?Gabriele Contessa - 2019 - Metaphysica 20 (1):5-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-30

Downloads
432 (#55,335)

6 months
137 (#41,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ashley Coates
University of Witwatersrand

Citations of this work

How to ground powers.David Builes - 2024 - Analysis 84 (2):231-238.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays.Jaegwon Kim - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):579-607.
Scientific Essentialism.Lenny Clapp - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (4):589-594.

View all 6 references / Add more references