Objecting morally

Journal of Ethics 1 (4):375-397 (1997)
Abstract
Just war theory entails that some wars may be morally unjustifiable, and hence citizens may be right to object morally to their government''s waging of a war and to their being compelled to serve in it. Given the evils attendant upon even justified war, this fact sharply restricts any obligation to die for the state, and raises important questions about the appropriate state response to selective conscientious objectors. This paper argues that such people should be legally accommodated, and discusses objections to doing so, in particular, the possible erosion of the state''s capacity to wage justified war, the unfairness of granting such exemptions from military service, and the impossibility of determining genuinely conscientious objection.
Keywords conscience  fairness  inscrutability  just war  mixed motives  moral free-riding  religion  selective conscientious objection  self-defence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004, 2016
DOI 10.1023/A:1009745023500
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,178
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Evilism, Moral Rationalism, and Reasons Internalism.Christopher Gregory Weaver - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (1):3-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

24 ( #206,355 of 2,153,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,080 of 2,153,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums