Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):121–136 (2005)
abstract This paper aims to gain a deeper understanding of the different forms of moralism in order to throw light upon debates about the role of morality in international affairs. In particular, the influential doctrine of political realism is reinterpreted as objecting not to a role for morality in international politics, but to the baneful effects of moralism. This is a more sympathetic reading than that usually given by philosophers to the realist doctrines. I begin by showing the ambiguity and elusiveness of realist claims about morality in politics and then distinguish six forms of moralism, understood as a distortion of genuine morality: moralism of scope, of imposition, of abstraction, of absolutism, of inappropriate explicitness, and of deluded power. I argue that most of these are relevant to typical realist claims and can make their objections more plausible. But, though realists can be interpreted as rightly drawing attention to the dangers of moralism in international and national affairs, their conflation of moralism with morality wrongly leads them to an exaltation of the pursuit of national interest and to the rejection of policies and judgements that are not in fact moralistic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reality at Risk: A Defence of Realism in Philosophy and the Sciences.Roger Trigg - 1980 - Barnes & Noble.
Ethics and Mathematics: The Reliability Challenge. Clarke-Doane - manuscript -
Naturalism and Normativity.Seiriol Morgan - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):319 - 344.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #186,803 of 2,132,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #238,214 of 2,132,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.