Varzi on Supervaluationism and Logical Consequence

Mind 120 (479):833-43 (2011)
Though it is standardly assumed that supervaluationism applied to vagueness is committed to global validity, Achille Varzi (2007) argues that the supervaluationist should take seriously the idea of adopting local validity instead. Varzi’s motivation for the adoption of local validity is largely based on two objections against the global notion: that it brings some counterexamples to classically valid rules of inference and that it is inconsistent with unrestricted higher-order vagueness. In this discussion I review these objections and point out ways to address them not considered in Varzi’s paper.
Keywords Global Validity  Supervaluationism  Vagueness  Higher-order vagueness  Logical consequence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzq069
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,182
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness: Subvaluationism.Pablo Cobreros - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):472-485.
Tolerant, Classical, Strict.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):347-385.
Supervaluationism: Truth, Value and Degree Functionality.Pablo Cobreros & Luca Tranchini - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):136-144.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

193 ( #22,548 of 2,172,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,295 of 2,172,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums