Ownership and justice for animals

Utilitas 21 (4):424-442 (2009)
Abstract
This article argues that it is not necessary to abolish all incidents of animal ownership in order to achieve justice for them. It claims that ownership does not grant owners a right to absolute control of their property. Rather, it argues that ownership is a much more qualified concept, conveying different rights in different contexts. With this understanding of ownership in mind, the article argues that it is possible for humans to own animals and at the same time to treat them justly: to recognize that they possess moral status; to assign them meaningful rights; and to consider their interests equally
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820809990203
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,723
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Duties to Companion Animals.Steve Cooke - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):261-274.
The Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare Are Rights.Clare McCausland - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):649-662.
Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life. Hadley - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):87-103.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-11-13

Total downloads
96 ( #63,182 of 2,261,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #104,345 of 2,261,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature