What’s Really Wrong with Fining Crimes? On the Hard Treatment of Criminal Monetary Fines

Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):395-415 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Among the advocates of expressive theories of punishment, there is a strong consensus that monetary fines cannot convey the message of censure that is required to punish serious crimes or crimes against the person. Money is considered an inappropriate symbol to express condemnation. In this article, I argue that this sentiment is correct, although not for the reasons suggested by advocates of expressivism. The monetary day-fine should not be understood as a simple deprivation of money, but as a punishment that reduces the offender’s capacity to consume for a certain period of time. Conceived in this manner, I argue that it is perfectly suitable to convey censure. However, the practical impossibility of ensuring that the person who pays the fine is the same person who has been convicted of the offense seriously undermines the acceptability of the monetary fine as an instrument of censure. Minimizing the risk of the fine’s hard treatment being transferred to third parties is a necessary condition for the monetary fine to be considered a viable alternative to lengthy prison sentences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The elusive object of punishment.Gabriel S. Mendlow - 2019 - Legal Theory 25 (2):105-131.
Two types of legal wrongdoing.M. E. Newhouse - 2016 - Legal Theory 22 (1):59-75.
Public and Private Wrongs.R. A. Duff & Sandra Marshall - 2010 - In James Chalmers, Fiona Leverick & Lindsay Farmer (eds.), Essays in Criminal Law in Honour of Sir Gerald Gordon. Edinburgh: Edinburhg University Press. pp. 70-85.
Yaffe on attempts.Larry Alexander - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (2):124-135.
The Moral Foundations of International Criminal Law.Jamie Terence Kelly - 2010 - Journal of Human Rights 9 (4):502-510.
Proxy Crimes and Overcriminalization.Youngjae Lee - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (3):469-484.
Attempted Homicide.R. A. Duff - 1995 - Legal Theory 1 (2):149-178.
Wrongs, Crimes, and Criminalization.Douglas Husak - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (3):393-407.
Universal Jurisdiction and International Criminal Law.Jovana Davidovic - 2015 - In Chad Flanders & Zachary Hoskins (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 113-130.
Crimes Against Animals.Heidi M. Hurd - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 71-93.
Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account.Larry May - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

17 (#871,044)

6 months
10 (#272,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
The Problem of Punishment.David Boonin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
The Expressive Function of Punishment.Joel Feinberg - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):397-423.

View all 33 references / Add more references