Was Samuel Butler Mainly Right About Evolution? Part I


Abstract
Samuel Butler, a contemporary critic of Charles Darwin, proffered an alternative, vitalistic account of evolution. At the same time, he put into question all modern naturalistic treatments of this fundamental idea which presuppose that evolution is mainly a scientific problem. On the contrary, Butler in effect insists, this extremely vague idea calls for not an `explanation' but rather a fairly comprehensive, plausible story that helps elucidate an inherently complex idea. Butler can thus be read as outlining an anthropomorphic metaphorics that evokes a living Cosmos wherein it might be possible to do justice to the problem which Darwin left unresolved---the problem of heredity. In this picture of the Cosmos Butler links the fundamental notion of organization not to the allegedly universal and immutable `laws of nature,' as the moderns would have it, but rather to dynamically evolving relationships between only more or less stable habits. The variations in extant habits that emergence elicits are moreover the products of quasi-intelligent responses to new challenges from the environment. For Butler follows Lamarck in holding that all organisms possess powers capable of responding to felt needs and/or desires to make alterations in the habits that characterize their modes of existence. He thus in the end effectively bequeaths to his readers a challenge to extend and amplify, if possible, his outline of a promising metaphysical imaginary that can take into account some highly unorthodox conjectures.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Was Samuel Butler Mainly Right About Evolution?Murray Code - 2013 - Cosmos and History 9 (1):73-100.
The Notebooks of Samuel Butler. Samuel Butler, Henry Festing Jones.Sydney Waterlow - 1913 - International Journal of Ethics 23 (4):497-499.
The Notebooks of Samuel Butler.Samuel Butler & Henry Festing Jones - 1913 - International Journal of Ethics 23 (4):497-499.
Butler and the Nature of Self-Interest.David Phillips - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):421-438.
Bishop Butler's View of Conscience.D. Daiches Raphael - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (90):219-238.
Butler and the Nature of Self-Interest.David Phillips - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):421-438.
Evolution, Old & New.Samuel Butler - 1924 - New York: American Mathematical Society.
Joseph Butler on Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2014 - In Johannes Brachtendorf & Stephan Herzberg (eds.), Vergebung: Philosophische Perspektiven auf ein Problemfeld der Ethik. Muenster: Mentis. pp. 139-47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-24

Total views
3 ( #1,178,237 of 2,264,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #863,502 of 2,264,553 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature