AI and Society 31 (4):455-462 (2016)

Mark Coeckelbergh
University of Vienna
The discussion about robots in elderly care is populated by doom scenarios about a totally dehumanized care system in which elderly people are taken care of by machines. Such scenarios are helpful as they attend us to what we think is important with regard to the quality elderly care. However, this article argues that they are misleading in so far as they (1) assume that deception in care is always morally unacceptable, (2) suggest that robots and other information technologies necessarily deceive elderly people by creating a “virtual” world as opposed to a “real” world, (3) assume that elderly people of the future have similar ICT skills and interests as the elderly people of today, and (4) assume a simplistic view of technologies. The article suggests an approach to evaluating care robots and ICT in health care which acknowledges and addresses a number of ethical problems raised by robotic care—for instance disengagement problems—while taking into account that some elderly people may need care that does not treat them as (empirically) autonomous, that many the elderly of the future are likely to be digital natives, and that the task of evaluating technologies in care is more complicated than the discussion of deception suggests.
Keywords Care robots  Elderly care  Information technology  Deception  The social  Disengagement  Modernity  Capability approach  Care craftsmanship
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s00146-015-0626-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Vincent C. Müller - 2020 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Palo Alto, Cal.: CSLI, Stanford University. pp. 1-70.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Must We Ration Health Care for the Elderly?Daniel Callahan - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):10-16.
Response to Roger W. Hunt.D. Callahan - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (1):24-27.
Artificial Agents, Good Care, and Modernity.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (4):265-277.
Scale of Levels of Care Versus DNR Orders.D. Vanpee - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):351-352.
Care for One's Own Future Experiences.Marc Slors - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):183-195.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #180,802 of 2,448,954 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #177,278 of 2,448,954 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes