Imagination, distributed responsibility and vulnerable technological systems: The case of Snorre a

Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):235-248 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An influential approach to engineering ethics is based on codes of ethics and the application of moral principles by individual practitioners. However, to better understand the ethical problems of complex technological systems and the moral reasoning involved in such contexts, we need other tools as well. In this article, we consider the role of imagination and develop a concept of distributed responsibility in order to capture a broader range of human abilities and dimensions of moral responsibility. We show that in the case of Snorre A, a near-disaster with an oil and gas production installation, imagination played a crucial and morally relevant role in how the crew coped with the crisis. For example, we discuss the role of scenarios and images in the moral reasoning and discussion of the platform crew in coping with the crisis. Moreover, we argue that responsibility for increased system vulnerability, turning an undesired event into a near-disaster, should not be ascribed exclusively, for example to individual engineers alone, but should be understood as distributed between various actors, levels and times. We conclude that both managers and engineers need imagination to transcend their disciplinary perspectives in order to improve the robustness of their organisations and to be better prepared for crisis situations. We recommend that education and training programmes should be transformed accordingly.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Challenger to Columbia.Junichi Murata - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):30-44.
From Challenger to Columbia.Junichi Murata - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):30-44.
The social ascription of obligations to engineers.J. S. Busby & M. Coeckelbergh - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):363-376.
Engineers’ Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.Shan Jing & Neelke Doorn - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):233-253.
Regulation or responsibility?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2006 - Science, Technology and Human Values 31 (3):237-260.


Added to PP

57 (#278,084)

6 months
10 (#397,791)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Coeckelbergh
University of Vienna

References found in this work

A treatise of human nature.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1739 - Oxford,: Clarendon press.
The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya.
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.Erving Goffman - 1974 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):601-602.

View all 12 references / Add more references