Mandatory Ultrasound Laws and the Coercive Use of Informed Consent

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):16-30 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Requiring that a woman who is seeking an abortion be given the opportunity to view an ultrasound of her fetus has spread from anti-abortion “pregnancy resource centers” to state laws. Proponents of these laws claim that having access to the ultrasound image is necessary for a woman to make a medically informed decision. In this paper, we argue that ultrasound examinations frame fetuses visually and linguistically as persons and interpellate pregnant women as mothers, with all of the cultural meaning invested in those two normative concepts. Presenting these judgments as medical information is misleading. Because women are being subjected to these cultural expectations unknowingly, mandatory ultrasound laws in fact undermine women’s autonomy. Fully informed consent would include a critical engagement with social norms around femininity and a recognition that such laws are meant to advance the state’s interest in preserving potential life.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
62 (#275,294)

6 months
10 (#567,741)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Cynthia Coe
Central Washington University
Matthew Altman
Central Washington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references