Abstract
This paper considers a particular instance in which a liberal state –Germany -makes a claim for the limitation of tolerance of religious expression on the grounds of harm. I examine this claim with reference to three basic positions: Firstly,I examine Denise Meyerson’s argument that the domain of religion constitutes an area of intractable dispute and that the state is not entitled to limit liberty in this domain because it cannot justify limitations in a neutrally acceptable way. I argue that Ludin is entitled to wear the Kopftuch on grounds of her right to religious freedom and that the attempt to deny her this entitlement constitutes a breach of individual rights. Meyerson’s arguments rest on the acceptability of Rawls’s idea of public reason. I therefore, secondly, examine Jeremy Waldron’s objections to the use of the deliberative discipline of public reason in cultural disputes as well as his objections to the use of the politics of identity which, he claims, distort our ability to engage in reasoned public debate. I argue that bracketing identity claims eliminates what is peculiar about Ludin’s case.This I bring out, thirdly, by drawing on the views of Melissa Williams, who advances the idea of sensitivity to others’ reasons as reasons, which defines a position midway between Meyerson and Waldron. It is apparent that Ludin’s dilemma is twofold: her status as ‘metic’-as member of a minority at the margins of mainstream German culture, and her status as ‘Muslimin’-as one believed to be suffering sexual discrimination in her own culture, form a double-bind of oppression. They are connected in a way that challenges the integration policies of the German state.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Spheres of Justice.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Basic Books.
The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Liberalism, Community, and Culture.Will Kymlicka - 1989 - Oxford University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Will Poland Be the Most Confessional State of the European Union?Krystian Complak - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):85-95.
The Moral Distinctiveness of the European Union.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - forthcoming - International Journal of Constitutional Law.
Abbe de Saint-Pierre: European Union and the Turk.T. Mastnak - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (4):570-598.
Lobbying – A Political Communication Tool for Churches and Religious Organizations.Liliana Mihut - 2011 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 10 (29):64-86.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-28

Total views
41 ( #234,292 of 2,344,172 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #187,739 of 2,344,172 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes