“I Didn't Say That”: Margaret Mead on Nature, Nurture, and Gender in the Nuclear Age

Modern Intellectual History:1-21 (forthcoming)

Authors
E. J. Coffman
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Abstract
The anthropologist Margaret Mead is widely known for stating that human nature is “almost unbelievably malleable,” meaning that individual identity—including gender—is shaped more by culture than by biology. Many feminists, notably Betty Friedan, seized on this idea as a tool for dismantling sexist biases but were dismayed when Mead's later work seemed to relegate women to a biologically determined, maternal role. Mead, however, argued strenuously in print and correspondence that she never intended to set nature against nurture, for she believed that identity grew from the interplay of the two. The historical context for Mead's thinking changed, as the menace of eugenic politics in the 1930s yielded to the existential threat of nuclear annihilation after 1945, but Mead never fundamentally changed her mind about the production of gender.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1479244319000234
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Continuities in Cultural Evolution.Margaret Mead - 1965 - British Journal of Educational Studies 14 (1):106-106.
Childhood and society.E. H. Erikson - 1955 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 145:87-88.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Mead–Freeman Controversy Continues: A Reply to Ian Jarvie.Paul Shankman - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (3):309-332.
Margaret Mead in Samoa.Martin J. Kelly - 1999 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1999 (116):169-174.
Mead's Interpretation of Relativity Theory.Jake E. Stone - 2013 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27 (2):153-171.
The Social Dynamics of George H. Mead. [REVIEW]K. B. L. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):366-366.
Mead and the International Mind.Marilyn Fischer - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 508-531.
The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead Ed. By Hans Joas, Daniel R. Huebner.Erkki Kilpinen - 2017 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (4):631-635.
George Herbert Mead.Mitchell Aboulafia - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Social Psychology of George Herbert Mead. [REVIEW]R. A. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):707-707.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-18

Total views
2 ( #1,256,656 of 2,259,451 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #667,524 of 2,259,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature