Are Turing Machines Platonists? Inferentialism and the Computational Theory of Mind

Minds and Machines 20 (3):423-439 (2010)
Abstract
We first discuss Michael Dummett’s philosophy of mathematics and Robert Brandom’s philosophy of language to demonstrate that inferentialism entails the falsity of Church’s Thesis and, as a consequence, the Computational Theory of Mind. This amounts to an entirely novel critique of mechanism in the philosophy of mind, one we show to have tremendous advantages over the traditional Lucas-Penrose argument
Keywords Mechanism  Church’s thesis  Computational theory of mind  Dualism  Inferentialism  Platonism  Lucas-Penrose argument  Brandom  Dummett  Detlefsen  Wright
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-010-9203-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,975
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Emperor's New Mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Taming of the True.Neil Tennant - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-07-31

Total downloads

287 ( #9,767 of 2,058,163 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

40 ( #7,660 of 2,058,163 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums