Are Turing Machines Platonists? Inferentialism and the Computational Theory of Mind

Minds and Machines 20 (3):423-439 (2010)
Jason Megill
University of Virginia
Jon Cogburn
Louisiana State University
We first discuss Michael Dummett’s philosophy of mathematics and Robert Brandom’s philosophy of language to demonstrate that inferentialism entails the falsity of Church’s Thesis and, as a consequence, the Computational Theory of Mind. This amounts to an entirely novel critique of mechanism in the philosophy of mind, one we show to have tremendous advantages over the traditional Lucas-Penrose argument
Keywords Mechanism  Church’s thesis  Computational theory of mind  Dualism  Inferentialism  Platonism  Lucas-Penrose argument  Brandom  Dummett  Detlefsen  Wright
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-010-9203-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,208
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Emperor's New Mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Taming of the True.Neil Tennant - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
404 ( #8,106 of 2,242,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #7,375 of 2,242,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature