Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):30-47 (2012)

Authors
Zac Cogley
Northern Michigan University
Abstract
In this paper, I articulate and defend a conception of trust that solves what I call “the trickster problem.” The problem results from the fact that many accounts of trust treat it similar to, or identical with, relying on someone’s good will. But a trickster could rely on your good will to get you to go along with his scheme, without trusting you to do so. Recent philosophical accounts of trust aim to characterize what it is for one person to trust another so as to avoid this problem, but no extant account successfully does so. I argue that connecting trust to important, normatively defined relationships like friendship, romantic partnerships and parenting shows us something important about trust. The clearest cases of trust are found within the confines of normatively defined relationships like these, suggesting that there is a normative element to trust. Trusting someone involves not just believing that another person’s good will covers your interactions. Trusting involves believing that, at least in a certain domain of interaction, you are entitled to rely on that person’s good will. This account solves the trickster problem, because a trickster is not entitled to his victim’s good will.
Keywords Trust  Jones, Karen  Hieronymi, Pamela  Relationships
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.2153-960X.2012.00546.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):331-340.
Trust and Antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Trust.Carolyn McLeod - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.Mark Ryan - forthcoming - Science and Engineering Ethics:1-19.
Objections to Simpson’s Argument in ‘Robots, Trust and War’.Carol Lord - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (3):241-251.
Trust: A Recipe.Shane Ryan - 2018 - Think 17 (50):113-125.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Trust in Strangers, Trust in Friends.Jessica Miller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):17-22.
The Reasons of Trust.Pamela Hieronymi - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):213 – 236.
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Puzzles About Trust.Doran Smolkin - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.
On the Emotional Character of Trust.Bernd Lahno - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2):171-189.
Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe.Richard Holton - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):63 – 76.
Trust in Scientific Publishing.Harry Hummels & Hans E. Roosendaal - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (2):87 - 100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-10

Total views
415 ( #14,942 of 2,330,230 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #53,530 of 2,330,230 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes