Varied and Principled Understandings of Autonomy in English Law: Justifiable Inconsistency or Blinkered Moralism? [Book Review]
Health Care Analysis 15 (3):235-255 (2007)
AbstractAutonomy is a concept that holds much appeal to social and legal philosophers. Within a medical context, it is often argued that it should be afforded supremacy over other concepts and interests. When respect for autonomy merely requires non-intervention, an adult’s right to refuse treatment is held at law to be absolute. This apparently simple statement of principle does not hold true in practice. This is in part because an individual must be found to be competent to make a valid refusal of consent to medical treatment, and capacity to decide is not an absolute concept. But further to this, I argue that there are three relevant understandings of autonomy within our society, and each can demand in differing cases that different courses of action be followed. Judges, perhaps inadvertently, have been able to take advantage of the equivocal nature of the concept to come tacitly to decisions that reflect their own moral judgments of patients or decisions made in particular cases. The result is the inconsistent application of principle. I ask whether this is an unforeseen outcome or if it reflects a wilful disregard for equal treatment in favour of silent moral judgments in legal cases. Whatever the cause, I suggest that once this practice is seen to occur, acceptable justification of it in some cases is difficult to find
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Citations of this work
Saying Something Interesting About Responsibility for Health.Paul C. Snelling - 2012 - Nursing Philosophy 13 (3):161-178.
Evaluating Medico-Legal Decisional Competency Criteria.Demian Whiting - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):181-196.
Whatever You Want? Beyond the Patient in Medical Law.Richard Huxtable - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (3):288-301.
Similar books and articles
Anorexia, Welfare, and the Varieties of Autonomy: Judicial Rhetoric and the Law in Practice.Mark Bratton - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):159-162.
Should Healthcare Professionals Respect Autonomy Just Because It Promotes Welfare?D. Molyneux - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):245-250.
Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy.Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.
A Pretty Fine Line: Life, Death, Autonomy and Letting It B. [REVIEW]Hazel Biggs - 2003 - Feminist Legal Studies 11 (3):291-301.
Autonomy and Negatively Informed Consent.Ulrik Kihlbom - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):146-9.
On the Autonomy Turf. Assessing the Value of Autonomy to Patients.Lars Sandman - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (3):261-268.
How to Distinguish Autonomy From Integrity.Carolyn Mcleod - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):107 - 134.
An Intercultural Nursing Perspective on Autonomy.Ingrid Hanssen - 2004 - Nursing Ethics 11 (1):28-41.