“Give Me Children or I Shall Die!”: New Reproductive Technologies and Harm to Children

Hastings Center Report 26 (2):19-27 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some evidence suggests that IVF and other reproductive technologies create serious illness and disorders in a small but significant proportion of children who are born of them. If these technologies were found to do so, it would be wrong to forge ahead with their use.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3528572

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology.Janet Malek - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95.
Gay Science: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Sexual Orientation of Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2005 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 (Sup. 1):102-106.
How Safe is Safe Enough?: Obligations to the Children of Reproductive Technology.Philip G. Peters - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Do New Reproductive Technologies Benefit or Harm Children?Christine Overall - 2002 - In Donna L. Dickenson (ed.), Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Cambridge University Press.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
But murderers can have all the children they want: Surrogacy and public policy.Byron Chell - 1988 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (1).
Punishing the Innocent: Children of Incarcerated and Detained Parents.Manning Rita - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):267-287.
New Reproductive Technologies are Morally Problematic.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2000 - In James Torr (ed.), Medical Ethics. Greenhaven Press.
Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction.Stephen Wilkinson - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Paternal-Fetal Harm and Men’s Moral Duty to Use Contraception: Applying the Principles of Nonmaleficence and Beneficence to Men’s Reproductive Responsibility.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2014 - Medicine Studies 4 (1):1-13.
Legal issues of maternity and inheritance for the biotech child of the 21st century.Kristine S. Knaplund - unknown
Better Not to Have Children.Gerald K. Harrison & Julia Tanner - 2011 - Think, 10(27), 113-121 (27):113-121.
Genetic engineering to avoid genetic neglect: From chance to responsibility.Jessica Hammond - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (4):160-169.
The best possible child.M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):279-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
116 (#148,262)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Asymmetry: A Solution.Melinda A. Roberts - 2011 - Theoria 77 (4):333-367.
Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):43-59.
Genes, identity, and the expressivist critique.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - In Loane Skene and Janna Thompson (ed.), The Sorting Society. Cambridge University Press. pp. 111-132..

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references