How to be a fallibilist

Philosophical Perspectives 2:91-123 (1988)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2214070
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.Stewart Cohen - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):309-329.
Knowing the Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.
What Else Justification Could Be.Martin Smith - 2010 - Noûs 44 (1):10 - 31.

View all 181 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
424 ( #9,127 of 2,313,497 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,968 of 2,313,497 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature