Notions of sameness by default and their application to anaphora, vagueness, and uncertain reasoning
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (3):285-306 (2008)
We motivate and formalize the idea of sameness by default: two objects are considered the same if they cannot be proved to be different. This idea turns out to be useful for a number of widely different applications, including natural language processing, reasoning with incomplete information, and even philosophical paradoxes. We consider two formalizations of this notion, both of which are based on Reiter’s Default Logic. The first formalization is a new relation of indistinguishability that is introduced by default. We prove that the corresponding default theory has a unique extension, in which every two objects are indistinguishable if and only if their non-equality cannot be proved from the known facts. We show that the indistinguishability relation has some desirable properties: it is reflexive, symmetric, and, while not transitive, it has a transitive “flavor.” The second formalization is an extension (modification) of the ordinary language equality by a similar default: two objects are equal if and only if their non-equality cannot be proved from the known facts. It appears to be less elegant from a formal point of view. In particular, it gives rise to multiple extensions. However, this extended equality is better suited for most of the applications discussed in this paper.
|Keywords||Anaphora Default Logic Equality Herbrand models Indistinguishability Rough Set Theory Sorites Vagueness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Semantic Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25:75-94.
Rough Sets.Zdzislaw Pawlak, Jerzy Grzymala-Busse, Roman Slowinski & Wojciech Ziarko - 1995 - Commun. Acm 38 (11):88--95.
Sameness and Individuation.D. Gabbay & J. M. Moravcsik - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (16):513-526.
Citations of this work BETA
The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions.Sam Alxatib & Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 2011 - Mind and Language 26 (3):287-326.
Indiscriminability as Indiscernibility by Default.Ariel Cohen - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (3):369-383.
Similar books and articles
Is Default Logic a Reinvention of Inductive-Statistical Reasoning?Yao-Hua Tan - 1997 - Synthese 110 (3):357-379.
Order Independent and Persistent Typed Default Unification.Alex Lascarides, Ted Briscoe, Nicholas Asher & Ann Copestake - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (1):1 - 90.
An Implementation of Statistical Default Logic.Gregory Wheeler & Carlos Damasio - 2004 - In Jose Alferes & Joao Leite (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2004). Springer.
A Directly Cautious Theory of Defeasible Consequence for Default Logic Via the Notion of General Extension.G. Aldo Antonelli - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence 109 (1-2):71-109.
Defaults as Restrictions on Classical Hilbert-Style Proofs.Gianni Amati, Luigia Carlucci Aiello & Fiora Pirri - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (4):303-326.
An Interpretation of Default Logic in Minimal Temporal Epistemic Logic.Joeri Engelfriet & Jan Treur - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):369-388.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #202,420 of 2,143,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,774 of 2,143,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.