Sounds and temporality

Abstract
What is the relationship between sounds and time? More specifically, is there something essentially or distinctively temporal about sounds that distinguishes them from, say, colors, shapes, odors, tastes, or other sensible qualities? And just what might this distinctive relation to time consist in? Apart from their independent interest, these issues have a number of important philosophical repercussions. First, if sounds are temporal in a way that other sensible qualities are not, then this would mean that standard lists of paradigm secondary qualities offered by Locke, Galileo, and other modern philosophers — lists which include colors, odors and sounds without any significant distinctions — overlook significant metaphysical differences. This, in turn, would threaten to undermine the coherence of the modern understanding of secondary qualities itself. Moreover, a number of authors have recently urged that the essential temporality of sounds makes it impossible to understand sounds as properties (except on a trope theory of properties; see note 3). If true, and given the more or less universal view that colors are properties, this last conclusion would make potentially inapplicable to sounds much of the comparatively well-developed philosophical taxonomy and apparatus that has arisen in philosophical disputes over the status of colors (for presentations of this taxonomy and apparatus see, for example, Byrne and Hilbert (2003); Cohen (2008b)).1 Therefore, the conclusion that sounds are distinctively temporal would be a serious blow to hopes for a theoretically unified treatment of the sensory qualities.2 For all these reasons, quite a lot seems to hang on the question of the temporality of sounds.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Husserl, the Absolute Flow, and Temporal Experience.Christoph Hoerl - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):376-411.
Hearing Properties, Effects or Parts?Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):375-405.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Lessons From Beyond Vision (Sounds and Audition).Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):143-160.
What Are Auditory Objects?Matthew Nudds - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):105-122.
The Puzzle of Temporal Experience.Sean D. Kelly - 2005 - In Andrew Brook (ed.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 208--238.
Sounds: A Philosophical Theory.Casey O'Callaghan - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Hearing Properties, Effects or Parts?Casey O'Callaghan - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):375-405.
Aesthetic Strategies in Sonification.Florian Grond & Thomas Hermann - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (2):213-222.
Sounds and Events.Casey O'Callaghan - 2009 - In Matthew Nudds & Casey O'Callaghan (eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 26--49.
The Nature of Noise.John Kulvicki - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8 (11):1-16.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

96 ( #52,922 of 2,164,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #128,955 of 2,164,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums