Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (1):53-78 (1995)
This paper explores the influence of operationalism and its corollary, descriptivism, on Paul Samuelson's revealed preference theory as it developed between 1937 and 1948. Samuelson urged the disencumbering of metaphysics from economic theory. As an illustration, he showed how utility could be operationally redefined as revealed preference, and, furthermore, how from hypotheses such as maximizing behavior, operationally meaningful theorems could be deduced, thereby satisfying his demand for a scientific, empirical approach toward consumer behavior theory. In this paper I discuss the ensuing debate during the 1950s and 1960s on Samuelson's operationalism that raised doubts about its efficacy. In addition, I argue that certain concepts (revealed preference, equilibrium) and theorems (e.g., weak and strong axioms) that are supposedly operational in revealed preference theory, lack operational meaning, not withstanding their mathematical implications. Finally, I suggest that, although Samuelson's methodological rhetoric did not correspond with his implicit aprioristic theorizing, he possibly thought that his methodology and theorizing would converge in the long run.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.Amartya K. Sen - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):317-344.
Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Alexander Rosenberg - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Philosophy of Science in the Netherlands.James W. McAllister - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):191 – 204.
Similar books and articles
Revealed Preference, Belief, and Game Theory.Daniel M. Hausman - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):99-115.
Research Programs, Model-Building and Actor-Network-Theory: Reassessing the Case of the Leontief Paradox.Justin Bledin & Sharon Shewmake - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (4):455-476.
An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, Â€Œoldâ€ and Â€Œnewâ€, and Social Choice Theory.Kotaro Suzumura - manuscript
Autodetermination in Microeconomics – A Methodological Case Study on the Theory of Demand.Olaf L. Müller - 2004 - Analyse & Kritik 26 (2):319-345.
Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Weakly Implementable Social Choice Rules.Taradas Bandyopadhyay & Larry Samuelson - 1992 - Theory and Decision 33 (2):135-151.
The Predictive Role of Counterfactuals.Alfredo Di Tillio, Itzhak Gilboa & Larry Samuelson - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (2):167-182.
What Kind of Preference Maximization Does the Weak Axiom of Revealed Non-Inferiority Characterize?Michele Lombardi - manuscript
The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology After Samuelson, Lawrence A. Boland. London: Routledge, 1989, V + 194 Pages. [REVIEW]William B. Griffith - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):119-122.
Samuelson's "Transformation" of Marxism Into Bourgeois Economics.Paul Mattick - 1972 - Science and Society 36 (3):258 - 273.
Impossibility Theorems for Normal Form Games.David Squires - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (1):67-81.
Reconciliation with the Utility of Chance by Elaborated Outcomes Destroys the Axiomatic Basis of Expected Utility Theory.Robin Pope - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (3):223-234.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads13 ( #357,754 of 2,178,245 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,245 )
How can I increase my downloads?