The Animal Rights Debate

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2001)

Abstract

Here, for the first time, the world's two leading authorities—Tom Regan, who argues for animal rights, and Carl Cohen, who argues against them—make their respective case before the public at large. The very terms of the debate will never be the same. This seminal moment in the history of the controversy over animal rights will influence the direction of this debate throughout the rest of the century

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
166 (#72,882)

6 months
11 (#68,416)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Regan
Last affiliation: North Carolina State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals.Stephen Puryear - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):250-269.
Animal Rights and the Problem of R-Strategists.Kyle Johannsen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):333-45.
What is Speciesism?Oscar Horta - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
How Should Animals Be Treated?Jack Lee - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):181 – 189.
Animal Rights and Environmental Terrorism.Stephen Cooke - 2012 - Journal of Terrorism Research 4 (2):26-36.