- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Enduring Allure of Person-Affecting Arguments for Reproductive Technologies
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):44-46 (2022)
Abstract
Professor Sparrow’s (2022) Target Article helpfully elucidates the question of when the ordinary person-affecting conception of harm and benefit should apply to discussions of germline genome editi...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Affecting future individuals: Why and when germline genome editing entails a greater moral obligation towards progeny.Davide Battisti - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (5):1-9.
Should cloning be banned for the sake of the child?Helga Kuhse - 2001 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):17-33.
A fixed-population problem for the person-affecting restriction.Jacob M. Nebel - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2779-2787.
The limitations of liberal reproductive autonomy.J. Y. Lee - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3):523-529.
In Defense of the Internal Aspects View: Person-Affecting Reasons, Spectrum Arguments and Inconsistent Intuitions.Oscar Horta - 2014 - Law, Ethics and Philosophy 2:91-111.
Looking into the shadow: The eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - Monash Bioethics Review 36 (1-4):1-22.
How to Escape the Doctor's Dilemma? De‐Medicalize Reproductive Technologies.Paul A. Lombardo - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):326-329.
Copula: Sexual Technologies, Reproductive Powers.Robyn Ferrell - 2006 - State University of New York Press.
The texture of reproductive choice : law, ethnography, and reproductive technologies.Thérèse Murphy - 2009 - In New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Reply to Horta: Spectrum Arguments, the “Unhelpfulness” of Rejecting Transitivity, and Implications for Moral Realism.Larry Temkin - unknown
Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies.Charis Thompson - 2005 - MIT Press.
Socializing the public: invoking Hannah Arendt’s critique of modernity to evaluate reproductive technologies. [REVIEW]Daniel Sperling - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
Access to assisted reproductive technologies in France: the emergence of the patients' voice. [REVIEW]Véronique Fournier, Denis Berthiau, Julie D’Haussy & Philippe Bataille - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-08-31
Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
2022-08-31
Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
Legal and Ethical Issues in the Report Heritable Human Genome Editing.I. Glenn Cohen & Eli Y. Adashi - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (3):8-12.
Legal and Ethical Issues in the Report Heritable Human Genome Editing.I. Glenn Cohen & Eli Y. Adashi - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (3):8-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo