Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare Plurals

Natural Language Semantics 10 (2):125-165 (2002)
Abstract
In this paper we show that focus structure determines the interpretation of bare plurals in English: topic bare plurals are interpreted generically, focused bare plurals are interpreted existentially. When bare plurals are topics they must be specific, i.e. they refer to kinds. After type-shifting they introduce variables which can be bound by the generic quantifier, yielding characterizing generics. Existentially interpreted bare plurals are not variables, but denote properties that are incorporated into the predicate.The type of predicate determines the interpretation of its bare plural subject. The individual/stage-level distinction, though important, is not sufficient: since only arguments can be topics, only those stage-level predicates which have locative arguments can have existential bare plural subjects.Certain verbs (e.g., hate) fail to incorporate their bare plural objects; therefore no existential reading of the object is available. We provide a novel solution to this puzzle based on the following two claims: (i) incorporated bare plurals do not introduce discourse referents; (ii) nonincorporating verbs are presuppositional
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1016576614139
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history
Admin Source id: wc://2006641   Serial ID: 753418
Change log    Delete without trace    Inspect

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,625
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Simple Generics.David Liebesman - 2011 - Noûs 45 (3):409-442.
Genericity Sans Gen.John Collins - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (1):34-64.
No Alternative to Alternatives.A. Cohen - 2009 - Journal of Semantics 26 (1):1-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Number-Neutral Bare Plurals and the Multiplicity Implicature.Eytan Zweig - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):353-407.
A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural.Greg N. Carlson - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):413 - 456.
On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars.Ariel Cohen - 2001 - Journal of Semantics 18 (3):183-209.
Bare Plurals and Donkey Anaphora.Peter Lasersohn - 1997 - Natural Language Semantics 5 (1):79-86.
Scopeless Quantity Words in Shona.Elizabeth Ferch - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (4):373-400.
The Semantics of Existence.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):31-63.
Bare Plurals as Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases.Brendan S. Gillon - 1990 - In Kyburg Henry E., Loui Ronald P. & Carlson Greg N. (eds.), Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 119--166.
Number Marking and (in)Definiteness in Kind Terms.Veneeta Dayal - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (4):393-450.
Bare Particulars and Individuation Reply to Mertz.J. P. Moreland & Timothy Pickavance - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):1 – 13.
The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions.Jennifer McKitrick - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):349–369.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total downloads
43 ( #140,866 of 2,259,993 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #147,714 of 2,259,993 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature