Understanding a Sentence Does Not Entail Knowing its Truth‐Conditions: Why the Epistemological Determination Argument Fails

Dialectica 67 (2):223-242 (2013)
Abstract
The determination argument is supposed to show that a sentence's meaning is at least a truth-condition. This argument is supposed to rest on innocent premises that even a deflationist about truth can accept. The argument comes in two versions: one is metaphysical and the other is epistemological. In this paper we will focus on the epistemological version. We will argue that the apparently innocent first premise of that version of the argument is not as innocent as it seems. If the premise is understood in the sense required for the argument to go through then it should be rejected by a deflationist.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1746-8361.12023
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Truth.Paul Horwich - 1998 - Clarendon Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Meaning and Truth-Conditions: A Reply to Kemp.Richard Heck - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):82–87.
Reply to Heck on Meaning and Truth-Conditions.Gary Kemp - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):233-236.
Two Contextualist Fallacies.Martin Montminy - 2010 - Synthese 173 (3):317 - 333.
Fate, Freedom and Contingency.Ferenc Huoranszki - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (1):79-102.
The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325 - 345.
How Wittgenstein Escapes the Slingshot.A. C. Genova - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:1-22.
Tensed Facts.Richard Swinburne - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (2):117 - 130.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2013-07-19

Total downloads

70 ( #74,525 of 2,164,542 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #62,460 of 2,164,542 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums