Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283 (2012)

There are universals of language; but is it also true, as the target article claims, that there are universals of reading? We believe there are no such universals, and invite others to refute our claim by providing a list of some universals of reading. If there are no universals of reading, there cannot be a universal model of reading
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12000155
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Ann S. Ferebee - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):167.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Three Trope Theories.Paweł Rojek - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
The Problem of Universals, Realism, and God.Paul Gould - 2012 - Metaphysica 13 (2):183-194.
The Problem of Universals.Charles Landesman - 1971 - New York: Basic Books.
Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - University of Notre Dame Press.
No Reason to Expect “Reading Universals”.Yonata Levy - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):293.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #272,231 of 2,289,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #86,340 of 2,289,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature