Bioethics 29 (6):424-430 (2015)

Abstract
Biobanks are essential tools for furthering a broad range of medical research areas. However, despite the plethora of national and international laws and guidelines which apply to them, the access and sharing policies of biobanks are only sparsely addressed by regulatory bodies. The ‘give and take’ process of biosample sharing is largely left up to biobank stakeholders themselves to oversee; it is therefore both in stakeholders' power, and in their interest, to ensure that sample accessibility is fair. This is an important step in motivating researchers to collaborate and pool samples, and is crucial to fostering trust in the absence of universally accepted standard practices. To date, little attention has been paid to how fairness considerations affect scientific material sharing, and no empirical research has been carried out to determine the role that fairness plays in collaborative studies. In order to begin to gain understanding in this area, we interviewed 36 biobank stakeholders currently working in Switzerland, focusing on their perceptions of current and optimal fair sharing practices. Our findings reveal that fairness is an important feature of exchange situations for these stakeholders, and that they have well-formed notions about the practical elements of fair sample access, although ideas about the concept of fairness itself are vague. In order to support efforts to network biobanks, attention should be paid to this issue to reassure all involved that they are getting a fair share in their cooperative efforts
Keywords biobank  fairness  sharing  collaboration
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12134
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Obstacles to Widening Biosample Research.Flora Colledge, Jakob Passweg & Bernice Elger - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):113-128.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fairness and Fair Shares.Keith Horton - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):88.
What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing?Bram De Jonge - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):127-146.
Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Concepts of Price Fairness: Empirical Research Into the Dutch Coffee Market.Robert Gielissen & Johan Graafland - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (2):165-178.
Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness.Robert A. Phillips - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1):51-66.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-25

Total views
29 ( #375,051 of 2,446,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes