Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):199-207 (2010)
It is commonly assumed that natural languages, construed as sets of sentences, contain denumerably many sentences. One argument for this claim is that the sentences of a language must be recursively enumerable by a grammar, if we are to understand how a speaker-hearer could exhibit unbounded competence in a language. The paper defends this reasoning by articulating and defending a principle that excludes the construction of a sentence non-denumerably many words long
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Standard Meter by Any Name is Still a Meter Long.Heather J. Gert - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):50-68.
Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents.Knud Lambrecht - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Designing Conversational Agents: Effect of Conversational Form on Our Comprehension. [REVIEW]Koji Yamashita, Hidekazu Kubota & Toyoaki Nishida - 2005 - AI and Society 20 (2):125-137.
Logical Form Andthe Vernacular.Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (4):393-424.
Logical Form and the Vernacular.Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (4):393–424.
On the Very Idea of a Theory of Meaning for a Natural Language.Eugen Fischer - 1997 - Synthese 111 (1):1-8.
Overhearing a Sentence: Recanati and the Cognitive View of Language.Fernando Martínez Manrique & Agustín Vicente - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (219):251.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #380,920 of 2,178,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?