Religious Studies 25 (2):179-190 (1989)

This paper provides a methodological schema for interpreting Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion that supports the traditional thesis that Philo represents Hume's views on religious belief. To understand the complexity of Hume's ‘naturalism’ and his assessment of religious belief, it is essential to grasp the manner in which Philo articulates a consistently Humean position in the Dialogues.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500001797
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,668
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Irony and Argument in Dialogues, XII.Scott Davis - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):239-257.
Irony and Argument in Dialogues, XII.Scott Davis - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):239.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Hume's Dialogues.Dorothy P. Coleman - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (2):179-190.
Hume’s Alleged Pyrrhonism.Dorothy Coleman - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):461-468.
Natural Belief and Religious Belief in Hume's Philosophy.Terence Penelhum - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (131):166-181.
Hume's "Dialectic".Dorothy P. Coleman - 1984 - Hume Studies 10 (2):139-155.
Hume's "Dialectic".Dorothy P. Coleman - 1984 - Hume Studies 10 (2):139-155.
Hume's Internalism.Dorothy Coleman - 1992 - Hume Studies 18 (2):331-347.
Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.Stanley Tweyman - 1986 - Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Kluwer Academic.
A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo’s “Confession” and Hume’s Soft Atheism.Benjamin S. Cordry - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.
Hume’s Concealed Attack on Religion and His Early Critics.James Fieser - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:431-449.
What's True About Hume's 'True Religion'?Don Garrett - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):199-220.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #445,603 of 2,331,483 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #588,490 of 2,331,483 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes