Information Increase in Biological Systems: How does Adaptation Fit?
Progress has become a suspect concept in evolutionary biology, not the least because the core concepts of neo-Darwinism do not support the idea that evolution is progressive. There have been a number of attempts to account for directionality in evolution through additions to the core hypotheses of neo-Darwinism, but they do not establish progressiveness, and they are somewhat of an ad hoc collection. The standard account of fitness and adaptation can be rephrased in terms of information theory. From this, an information of adaptation can be defined in terms of a fitness function. The information of adaptation is a measure of the mutual information between biota and their environment. If the actual state of adaptation lags behind the state of optimal adaptation, then it is possible for the information of adaptation to increase indefinitely. Since adaptations are functional, this suggests the possibility of progressive evolution in the sense of increasing adaptation. Keywords: evolution, information, adaptation, fitness, entropy, progress..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Mastodon in the Room: How Darwinian is Neo-Darwinism?Daniel R. Brooks - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):82-88.
Similar books and articles
The Prospects for an Evolutionary Psychology: Human Language and Human Reasoning. [REVIEW]Robert C. Richardson - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (4):541-557.
Teaching About Adaptation: Why Evolutionary History Matters. [REVIEW]Kostas Kampourakis - 2013 - Science and Education 22 (2):173-188.
Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-Effects in High-Level Vision.W. G. Clifford Colin & Rhodes Gillian (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology.Timothy Shanahan - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
On Semantic Pitfalls of Biological Adaptation.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):147-.
How Ubiquitous is Adaptation? A Critique of the Epiphenomenist Program.Leigh Van Valen - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):267-280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #557,585 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?