Improving the Quality of Host Country Ethical Oversight of International Research: The Use of a Collaborative ‘Pre‐Review’ Mechanism for a Study of Fexinidazole for Human A frican Trypanosomiasis
Carl H. Coleman, Chantal Ardiot, Séverine Blesson, Yves Bonnin, Francois Bompart, Pierre Colonna, Ames Dhai, Julius Ecuru, Andrew Edielu, Christian Hervé, François Hirsch, Bocar Kouyaté, Marie-France Mamzer-Bruneel, Dionko Maoundé, Eric Martinent, Honoré Ntsiba, Gérard Pelé, Gilles Quéva, Marie-Christine Reinmund, Samba Cor Sarr, Abdoulaye Sepou, Antoine Tarral, Djetodjide Tetimian, Olaf Valverde, Simon Van Nieuwenhove & Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft
Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):241-247 (2015)
AbstractDeveloping countries face numerous barriers to conducting effective and efficient ethics reviews of international collaborative research. In addition to potentially overlooking important scientific and ethical considerations, inadequate or insufficiently trained ethics committees may insist on unwarranted changes to protocols that can impair a study's scientific or ethical validity. Moreover, poorly functioning review systems can impose substantial delays on the commencement of research, which needlessly undermine the development of new interventions for urgent medical needs. In response to these concerns, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, an independent nonprofit organization founded by a coalition of public sector and international organizations, developed a mechanism to facilitate more effective and efficient host country ethics review for a study of the use of fexinidazole for the treatment of late stage African Trypanosomiasis. The project involved the implementation of a novel ‘pre-review’ process of ethical oversight, conducted by an ad hoc committee of ethics committee representatives from African and European countries, in collaboration with internationally recognized scientific experts. This article examines the process and outcomes of this collaborative process
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Research Ethics Governance in Times of Ebola.Doris Schopper, Raffaella Ravinetto, Lisa Schwartz, Eunice Kamaara, Sunita Sheel, Michael J. Segelid, Aasim Ahmad, Angus Dawson, Jerome Singh, Amar Jesani & Ross Upshur - 2017 - Public Health Ethics 10 (1).
Expert Perspectives on Ethics Review of International Data-Intensive Research: Working Towards Mutual Recognition.Edward S. Dove & Chiara Garattini - 2018 - Research Ethics 14 (1):1-25.
Developing an Evidence-Base to Guide Ethical Action in Global Challenges Research in Complex and Fragile Contexts: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Clara Calia, Cristóbal Guerra, Corinne Reid, Charles Marley, Paulina Barrera, Abdul-Gafar Tobi Oshodi & Lisa Boden - 2022 - Ethics and Social Welfare 16 (1):54-72.
Similar books and articles
Collaborative International Research: Ethical and Regulatory Issues Pertaining to Human Biological Materials at a South African Institutional Research Ethics Committee.Aslam Sathar, Amaboo Dhai & Stephan Linde - 2014 - Developing World Bioethics 14 (3):150-157.
Ethics Committees for Biomedical Research in Some African Emerging Countries: Which Establishment for Which Independence? A Comparison with the USA and Canada.J. -P. Rwabihama, C. Girre & A. -M. Duguet - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):243-249.
Ethical Review Issues in Collaborative Research Between Us and Low – Middle Income Country Partners: A Case Example.Scott Mcintosh, Essie Sierra, Ann Dozier, Sergio Diaz, Zahira Quiñones, Aron Primack, Gary Chadwick & Deborah J. Ossip-Klein - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (8):414-422.
A Survey of Scientist and Policy Makers' Attitudes Toward Research on Stored Human Biological Materials in Sri Lanka.Vajira H. W. Dissanayake, Dulika S. Sumathipala, U. G. A. C. Kariyawasam, J. M. D. N. M. M. Jayamanne, P. K. D. S. Nisansala & Reidar Lie - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):226-232.
Status of National Research Bioethics Committees in the WHO African Region.Joses Kirigia, Charles Wambebe & Amido Baba-Moussa - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-7.
The Reporting of Irb Review in Journal Articles Presenting Hiv Research Conducted in the Developing World.Robert L. Klitzman, Kelly Kleinert, Hoda Rifai-Bashjawish & L. E. U. Shiung - 2011 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):161-169.
Microbicide Research in Developing Countries: Have We Given the Ethical Concerns Due Consideration?Keymanthri Moodley - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-7.
Training Needs Assessment in Research Ethics Evaluation Among Research Ethics Committee Members in Three African Countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.Jérôme Ateudjieu, John Williams, Marie Hirtle, Cédric Baume, Joyce Ikingura, Alassane Niaré & Dominique Sprumont - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):88-98.
Research on Human Subjects: Australian Ethics Committees Take Tentative Steps.L. W. Osborne - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):66-68.
Review of National Research Ethics Regulations and Guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab Countries. [REVIEW]Ghiath Alahmad, Mohammad Al-Jumah & Kris Dierickx - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):34-.
Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2003 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Collaborative Healthcare Research: Some Ethical Considerations.Mohsin Raza - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):177-186.
Local Research Ethics Committees Can Audit Ethical Standards in Research.J. Berry - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
The Ghana Experience.Paulina Tindana & Okyere Boateng - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):277-281.
Research Ethics Committee Audit: Differences Between Committees.M. E. Redshaw, A. Harris & J. D. Baum - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (2):78-82.