Idealistic Studies 20 (3):258-259 (1990)

Abstract
Revitalizing the “patchwork theory” of Hans Vaihinger and Norman Kemp Smith, yet repudiating their assumption that a chronological order of composition can be discerned in the disjointed lines of argumentation in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer’s Kant and the Claims to Knowledge presents a formidable though questionable analysis of the Critique showing Kant’s sustained ambivalence between ontological realism and transcendental idealism that begins in his early writings and continues through the revision of the Critique and in his later unpublished manuscripts.
Keywords Continental Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0046-8541
DOI 10.5840/idstudies199020326
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,899
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
31 ( #330,543 of 2,402,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #68,342 of 2,402,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes