Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2):157-170 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
The goal of this article is to provide a slightly different spin on economists' use of the positive-normative distinction by providing some context for its use. The major difference is the following: philosophers and philosophically oriented economists, such as Hilary Putnam and John Davis, see the positive-normative distinction in economics as following from the logical positivist position, and they interpret comments made by economists as reflecting scientific methodological positions that have long since been repudiated by philosophers of science. This article argues that economists' use of the positive-normative distinction developed from the Mill–Keynes methodological tradition, which did not hold logical positivist views. Instead, it had pragmatic purposes and was designed to encourage economists to be more modest in their claims for the implications of economic theory. We conclude by arguing that economist's current use of the positive-normative distinction is problematic, as Davis suggests, but th..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024877
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Economics.John S. Mackenzie - 1891 - Mind 16 (61):110-113.
What Do Economists Analyze and Why: Values or Facts?Partha Dasgupta - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):221-278.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Eclipse of Value-Free Economics. The Concept of Multiple Self Versus Homo Economicus.Aleksander Ostapiuk - 2020 - Wrocław, Polska: Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business.
Values in Economics: A Recent Revival with a Twist.Magdalena Małecka - 2021 - Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (1):88-97.
Liberal Naturalism and Non-Epistemic Values.Ricardo F. Crespo - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):247-273.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anthropologists and Economists: Conflict or Cooperation?John Lodewijks - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1):81-104.
How Economists Got It Wrong: A Nuanced Account.David Colander - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1-2):1-27.
No Ethical Issues in Economics?Stuart Birks - 2013 - Economic Thought 2 (1).
Economic Imperialism.Kurt W. Rothschild - 2008 - Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):723-733.
Was Hobbes een rechtspositivist?R. Janse - 2002 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2:58-84.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-05-02

Total views
34 ( #337,335 of 2,519,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes